I'm still quite shellshocked about yesterday, but I have had one very cheering thing happen today - I got my first maths assignment back, and the mark was a High Distinction - 18.5 / 20. I was really worried about the assignment because it was based on a set of activities I did with my extremely bright 11yo sister, and since she had no trouble doing the activities I had no problems to observe and discuss! I wasn't sure I'd get above a credit for it and avoided picking it up last week because I was too scared lol. But apparently the lecturer really liked how I’d discussed the activities and built up arguments despite having had a maths whiz as a subject.
It’s truly bizarre that my highest mark so far has been in the subject that was my absolute weakest at school. But if teaching maths is something I can do, it very much makes up for the fact that I can’t do maths itself!
Monday, April 30, 2007
Oh, ffs . . .
Just when you thought it was safe to breathe!
My housemate, with whom I've been getting along splendidly, has suddenly and randomly decided that I have to move out. We haven't fought or even had an uncomfortable moment in the short time I've been here, and especially not in the incredibly small amount of time she's actually spent here as opposed to at her boyfriend's house which is where she really lives. And she refuses to give any explanation or even talk to me about it - just that she won't be renewing my lease and I'm "welcome" to move out sooner, because she "doesn't feel it's working out".
AARGH!
I was wracking my brains to think of what could have gone wrong, but there's nothing - the place is clean and tidy and I've been half-killing myself to get my stuff sorted out despite having had three assignments to hand in and having been sick twice, since I moved in. I was getting really upset about what it could be, but both Mum and James (my stepdad) are of the opinion that it's not me at all, and that the housemate has some problem of her own that she can only solve by forcing me to move out. This seems quite likely as she's been stuffing around with the storage and space use arrangements we had worked out - she promised me space for my boxes in the little storage room and space for my treadmill in the sunroom, but now she's totally filled up the storage room with her furniture, and then kept hinting that my boxes shouldn't be in the sunroom because she wanted to put her table in there (which would have taken away the room for my treadmill, not to mention making the sunroom another place where my storage boxes couldn't be). So it seems like she just didn't understand that having a housemate meant that you had to give up more of the house than one bedroom!
This infuriating circumstance has a silver lining though. When I found out about this yesterday, James was on his way to drop off the treadmill and pick up some of my storage boxes and furniture which could be stored in their shed. I phoned Mum to see if he had left yet, because obviously there was no point bringing the treadmill if I was moving again. When I burst into tears and explained what was going on, Mum suddenly said: "do you want to move home for 8 months?" (which is all the time left until I'll be off in the country teaching). I went back to their place to stay overnight, and we've worked out an arrangement that means that I can live in their tiny spare room until I get a placecment. I'll still have to work but I'll be able to pay off my debts with that money rather than just paying my bills, which is great.
It'll be strange going back to living in Mum's house (especially as my 11-yr-old sister now has my old bedroom, and I'll be moving into an even smaller room that is currently the kids' TV room), but it's worth it, and honestly I'm quite glad to be getting one last little taste of ordinary family life before I'm off into the strange wilds of the countryside!
The room really is tiny though. I'm going to have to give up my beloved queen bed (it would take up the whole room, almost!) and sleep on a single again, and I'll only be able to fit my wardrobe and desk and a couple of little chests of drawers in the room. But I'll manage, and 8 months is not a long time. Especially not the way time seems to fly these days - I'm still wondering who stole the middle of April!
So overall I'm actually very pleased with the way this has worked out. I'm going to have to start looking for a job in Midland - I can get to my current Subway job from Mum's place, but it's a very long way to go and currently you only have to be breathing and standing upright in order to get a job in WA, so there's no point working a long way away when I really don't have to.
I'm even wondering whether I might be able to go back to playing in the Perth Hills Concert Band on Tuesday evenings. That would be fantastic, I've missed that band hugely and I'll be able to use Mum's car to get there. I've never got to play my new flute around anyone else - I bought it on a whim in Sydney and I haven't been in a band since before I moved there - and I'd love to get to play it in concert.
As they say, change is the only constant . . . but this time I think it's a change for the better. Onwards and upwards . . .
My housemate, with whom I've been getting along splendidly, has suddenly and randomly decided that I have to move out. We haven't fought or even had an uncomfortable moment in the short time I've been here, and especially not in the incredibly small amount of time she's actually spent here as opposed to at her boyfriend's house which is where she really lives. And she refuses to give any explanation or even talk to me about it - just that she won't be renewing my lease and I'm "welcome" to move out sooner, because she "doesn't feel it's working out".
AARGH!
I was wracking my brains to think of what could have gone wrong, but there's nothing - the place is clean and tidy and I've been half-killing myself to get my stuff sorted out despite having had three assignments to hand in and having been sick twice, since I moved in. I was getting really upset about what it could be, but both Mum and James (my stepdad) are of the opinion that it's not me at all, and that the housemate has some problem of her own that she can only solve by forcing me to move out. This seems quite likely as she's been stuffing around with the storage and space use arrangements we had worked out - she promised me space for my boxes in the little storage room and space for my treadmill in the sunroom, but now she's totally filled up the storage room with her furniture, and then kept hinting that my boxes shouldn't be in the sunroom because she wanted to put her table in there (which would have taken away the room for my treadmill, not to mention making the sunroom another place where my storage boxes couldn't be). So it seems like she just didn't understand that having a housemate meant that you had to give up more of the house than one bedroom!
This infuriating circumstance has a silver lining though. When I found out about this yesterday, James was on his way to drop off the treadmill and pick up some of my storage boxes and furniture which could be stored in their shed. I phoned Mum to see if he had left yet, because obviously there was no point bringing the treadmill if I was moving again. When I burst into tears and explained what was going on, Mum suddenly said: "do you want to move home for 8 months?" (which is all the time left until I'll be off in the country teaching). I went back to their place to stay overnight, and we've worked out an arrangement that means that I can live in their tiny spare room until I get a placecment. I'll still have to work but I'll be able to pay off my debts with that money rather than just paying my bills, which is great.
It'll be strange going back to living in Mum's house (especially as my 11-yr-old sister now has my old bedroom, and I'll be moving into an even smaller room that is currently the kids' TV room), but it's worth it, and honestly I'm quite glad to be getting one last little taste of ordinary family life before I'm off into the strange wilds of the countryside!
The room really is tiny though. I'm going to have to give up my beloved queen bed (it would take up the whole room, almost!) and sleep on a single again, and I'll only be able to fit my wardrobe and desk and a couple of little chests of drawers in the room. But I'll manage, and 8 months is not a long time. Especially not the way time seems to fly these days - I'm still wondering who stole the middle of April!
So overall I'm actually very pleased with the way this has worked out. I'm going to have to start looking for a job in Midland - I can get to my current Subway job from Mum's place, but it's a very long way to go and currently you only have to be breathing and standing upright in order to get a job in WA, so there's no point working a long way away when I really don't have to.
I'm even wondering whether I might be able to go back to playing in the Perth Hills Concert Band on Tuesday evenings. That would be fantastic, I've missed that band hugely and I'll be able to use Mum's car to get there. I've never got to play my new flute around anyone else - I bought it on a whim in Sydney and I haven't been in a band since before I moved there - and I'd love to get to play it in concert.
As they say, change is the only constant . . . but this time I think it's a change for the better. Onwards and upwards . . .
Thursday, April 26, 2007
Subtle Stereotypes
Since my recent epiphanies of self-knowledge, I’ve been listening to a selection of fairly soppy pop songs on the subject of self-belief, self-actualisation and generally moving forward. And I noticed that when the songs are sung by women, the message, subtly or overtly, is almost always that the point of all this esteem-building is to be capable of finding or attracting love. I was surprised and concerned to realise this, for two reasons.
Firstly, some of the most messed-up people I know, with the lowest self-esteem and worst attitudes, are in what they consider to be great, true-love relationships; some are even married, despite the terrible way they treat themselves (and sometimes others as well). So clearly a healthy mental attitude to oneself is not a prerequisite to achieving a relationship or even to being happy with that relationship. So why is popular culture selling women the idea that we can’t be attractive if our soul is a little knocked around?
And secondly, why the hell is finding love the point of positive self-belief anyway?! Surely it’s an end in itself, something to be celebrated as an achievement not as a stepping-stone to something else? Not that I’m against thinking about a good relationship as something to aim for, but as far as I can see it shouldn’t be the driving force behind getting to know and understand yourself and facing down your demons. Isn’t being happy a good enough reason to do that?
I have no answers to either of these, but the whole thing is concerning. It seems to me that while today the forces of evil are calories and low self-esteem – rather than wicked witches and cruel stepmothers – we’re still all being trained to see that Prince Charming is the reason why we’re fighting. And that’s not right at all.
*Sigh*
Firstly, some of the most messed-up people I know, with the lowest self-esteem and worst attitudes, are in what they consider to be great, true-love relationships; some are even married, despite the terrible way they treat themselves (and sometimes others as well). So clearly a healthy mental attitude to oneself is not a prerequisite to achieving a relationship or even to being happy with that relationship. So why is popular culture selling women the idea that we can’t be attractive if our soul is a little knocked around?
And secondly, why the hell is finding love the point of positive self-belief anyway?! Surely it’s an end in itself, something to be celebrated as an achievement not as a stepping-stone to something else? Not that I’m against thinking about a good relationship as something to aim for, but as far as I can see it shouldn’t be the driving force behind getting to know and understand yourself and facing down your demons. Isn’t being happy a good enough reason to do that?
I have no answers to either of these, but the whole thing is concerning. It seems to me that while today the forces of evil are calories and low self-esteem – rather than wicked witches and cruel stepmothers – we’re still all being trained to see that Prince Charming is the reason why we’re fighting. And that’s not right at all.
*Sigh*
Wednesday, April 25, 2007
ANZAC Day
They shall grow not old,
As we that are left grow old,
Age shall not weary them,
Nor the years condemn.
At the going down of the sun,
And in the morning
We will remember them.
Lest We Forget
As we that are left grow old,
Age shall not weary them,
Nor the years condemn.
At the going down of the sun,
And in the morning
We will remember them.
Lest We Forget

Last week I felt that I couldn't afford the taxi fares to go to the ANZAC Day dawn service in Kings Park, but yesterday I decided that I could, after all. So I've had a bit of a surreal morning - I left the house at 5am after about 4.5 hours' sleep, got back at 8am and went back to bed until midday. My body isn’t really sure what time it is!
The ceremony took place at Kings Park, an area of botanical gardens and natural bush that sits atop Mount Eliza, overlooking the city centre. Click here and scroll down to ‘State War Memorial Precinct’ for some images of the Cenotaph and the Flame of Remembrance, and you can check out some of the other memorials in the park too.
The service was magical. I’ve been to ANZAC services before – even participated in one as a schoolchild – and they all follow pretty much the same sequence, but the atmosphere of this one was just so special. It was incredible to stand there in the chilly dark with literally tens of thousands of others – veterans, current service people, and just-plain-folk like me – first watching war documentaries on big screens set up for the purpose, then watching the ceremony itself at the State War Memorial Cenotaph.
The playing of the Last Post wasn’t the best I’ve ever heard – there were several trumpets and I think it’s better with just one – but it was still deeply moving.
I don’t have any ANZAC war dead to remember, but my two Australian great-grandfathers were both ANZACs in WWII – Ernest was in the army and Kenneth was in the air force – and they are both gone now. And of course my non-Australian relatives were deeply affected by the war, in England, in Czechoslovakia, and in the then Dutch East Indies.
I don’t believe war is ever right or good, and I don’t support our leaders’ decisions to drag us in to some of the conflicts that Australia has been involved in. But when it comes down to it, rightly or wrongly, the lost service people of Australia died doing what they thought had to be done, and that’s all that matters. Regardless of my opinion of war, I do honour their sacrifices.
Tuesday, April 24, 2007
Science Experiment
On Monday, in our science curriculum workshop, we did a little mini-experiment. We were given three small jars: one containing a bit of a yeast and tepid water mixture, one containing a bit of a mixture of yeast, tepid water and one teaspoon of sugar, and one containing a bit of a mixture of yeast, tepid water and two teaspoons of sugar. We put balloons over the tops of the jars and watched as they filled with the gas produced by the respiration of the yeast, noting which jar produced the most gas (it was the third one, for the record).
While we were discussing the different variables that one could use in a yeast experiment, one that was mentioned was "the type of sugar". I do a lot of baking so I have a few different sugars around the place, and once I started thinking about it, I counted up no less than 7 different types of glucose-based foods in my stock cupboard.
So, feeling inspired, I stopped off at Target on the way home and bought myself a set of 8 little plastic jars (meant for cosmetics, but perfect for my purposes) and some balloons, and set about doing a yeast experiment for myself.

My ingredients all set out and ready to go
Using a funnel to avoid spillage, I added ¼ teaspoon of yeast to each jar. Then, again using a funnel for the dry sugars, I added ½ teaspoon of the following:
Jar 1: No Sugar (control)
Jar 2: Glucose Syrup
Jar 3: Golden Syrup
Jar 4: Honey
Jar 5: Brown Sugar
Jar 6: White Sugar
Jar 7: Caster Sugar
Jar 8: Icing Sugar Mixture (contains cornflour as well as sugar - normally I have the pure stuff!)
Then, with the funnel, I added two tablespoons of tepid water (tepid is just warmer than room temperature) to each jar, and then stirred each one briskly and placed a balloon over the top of the jar, ensuring that there was no air in the balloon when it went on.

The jars (left to right = 1-8, they are labelled in red pen if you look closely) just after the balloons went on. No reactions visible yet. Yes, I did the balloon colours that way on purpose!)
As the gas in the balloon increases, the balloon puffs up, and there reaches a point where the balloon will suddenly pop upright due to the pressure of the gas. 24 minutes after I put the balloons on, the first one popped up: 6 - White Sugar.

White sugar balloon puffed up with carbon dioxide
Over the next hour, the balloons continued to pop up, in this order:
1st: 6 - White Sugar (7:07pm)
2nd: 8 - Icing Sugar Mixture (7:10pm)
3rd: 4 - Honey (7:11pm)
4th: 3 - Golden Syrup (7:13pm)
5th: 7 - Caster Sugar (7:22pm)
6th: 2 - Glucose Syrup (7:35pm)

7:11pm

7:22pm

7:35pm

From the back, at 7:53, you can see the mixtures with their varying amounts of foam. Control is a little hard to see but you may be able to make out the fact that there was no reaction at all without a sugar substance.
5 - Brown Sugar did not pop up, but by 9:07pm I was able to gently stand it upright.

9:07pm - Brown Sugar balancing upright, despite not being fully pressurised at this point (as you can see - it is wrinkly around the edges).
By 10:51pm last night, 4 hours and 8 minutes after the experiment began, the balloons had reached the extent of their expansion and the real result of the experiment could be observed: which sugar produced the most respiration, and thus the most gas?

10:51pm: results are in!
As you can see, Glucose Syrup was far and away the most successful substance, producing twice as much gas as any of the others. This was the final tally:
1st: 2 - Glucose Syrup
2nd: 7 - Caster Sugar
3rd: 3 - Golden Syrup
4th: 8 - Icing Sugar Mixture
5th: 6 - White Sugar
6th: 4 - Honey
7th: 5 - Brown Sugar

Table: Rankings of Sugar Types
The most obvious thing I discovered in this experiment is that brown sugar is clearly not a good medium for producing respiration in yeast. It performed very poorly.
Excluding brown sugar and the control, a very interesting pattern emerges in the data. White Sugar, Icing Mixture and Honey were 1st, 2nd and 3rd in the order of inflation, but were 5th, 4th and 6th respectively in the amount of gas they produced. On the other hand, Golden Syrup, Caster Sugar and Glucose Syrup were 4th, 5th and 6th in popping up, but 3rd, 2nd and 1st respectively in the amount of gas they produced. This suggests that a fast reaction is not necessarily going to produce the most gas; and in fact that the substances that took a little longer to get going produced more gas in the long term. One could postulate that this is because the substances that were quick to get going were used up before large quantities of gas could be produced?
Glucose was clearly the outstanding winner for producing sustained, regular respiration in yeast: it was slow to get going, but did not peak early and taper off the way the faster substances did.
Although my experiment was completed at this stage, I decided to leave it in place overnight, partly due to laziness and partly to see what would happen.

The Morning After
As you can see, Glucose (most gas) and White Sugar (first to inflate) remained inflated to an extent, although less than they were at their peak. The others had deflated and fallen down. I'm not sure why they did so, whether it was leakage or the gas was reabsorbed, or some other explanation.
But I'm not looking forward to opening them all up and filling my house with the smell of sugary yeast!
While we were discussing the different variables that one could use in a yeast experiment, one that was mentioned was "the type of sugar". I do a lot of baking so I have a few different sugars around the place, and once I started thinking about it, I counted up no less than 7 different types of glucose-based foods in my stock cupboard.
So, feeling inspired, I stopped off at Target on the way home and bought myself a set of 8 little plastic jars (meant for cosmetics, but perfect for my purposes) and some balloons, and set about doing a yeast experiment for myself.

My ingredients all set out and ready to go
Using a funnel to avoid spillage, I added ¼ teaspoon of yeast to each jar. Then, again using a funnel for the dry sugars, I added ½ teaspoon of the following:
Jar 1: No Sugar (control)
Jar 2: Glucose Syrup
Jar 3: Golden Syrup
Jar 4: Honey
Jar 5: Brown Sugar
Jar 6: White Sugar
Jar 7: Caster Sugar
Jar 8: Icing Sugar Mixture (contains cornflour as well as sugar - normally I have the pure stuff!)
Then, with the funnel, I added two tablespoons of tepid water (tepid is just warmer than room temperature) to each jar, and then stirred each one briskly and placed a balloon over the top of the jar, ensuring that there was no air in the balloon when it went on.

The jars (left to right = 1-8, they are labelled in red pen if you look closely) just after the balloons went on. No reactions visible yet. Yes, I did the balloon colours that way on purpose!)
As the gas in the balloon increases, the balloon puffs up, and there reaches a point where the balloon will suddenly pop upright due to the pressure of the gas. 24 minutes after I put the balloons on, the first one popped up: 6 - White Sugar.

White sugar balloon puffed up with carbon dioxide
Over the next hour, the balloons continued to pop up, in this order:
1st: 6 - White Sugar (7:07pm)
2nd: 8 - Icing Sugar Mixture (7:10pm)
3rd: 4 - Honey (7:11pm)
4th: 3 - Golden Syrup (7:13pm)
5th: 7 - Caster Sugar (7:22pm)
6th: 2 - Glucose Syrup (7:35pm)

7:11pm

7:22pm

7:35pm

From the back, at 7:53, you can see the mixtures with their varying amounts of foam. Control is a little hard to see but you may be able to make out the fact that there was no reaction at all without a sugar substance.
5 - Brown Sugar did not pop up, but by 9:07pm I was able to gently stand it upright.

9:07pm - Brown Sugar balancing upright, despite not being fully pressurised at this point (as you can see - it is wrinkly around the edges).
By 10:51pm last night, 4 hours and 8 minutes after the experiment began, the balloons had reached the extent of their expansion and the real result of the experiment could be observed: which sugar produced the most respiration, and thus the most gas?

10:51pm: results are in!
As you can see, Glucose Syrup was far and away the most successful substance, producing twice as much gas as any of the others. This was the final tally:
1st: 2 - Glucose Syrup
2nd: 7 - Caster Sugar
3rd: 3 - Golden Syrup
4th: 8 - Icing Sugar Mixture
5th: 6 - White Sugar
6th: 4 - Honey
7th: 5 - Brown Sugar

Table: Rankings of Sugar Types
The most obvious thing I discovered in this experiment is that brown sugar is clearly not a good medium for producing respiration in yeast. It performed very poorly.
Excluding brown sugar and the control, a very interesting pattern emerges in the data. White Sugar, Icing Mixture and Honey were 1st, 2nd and 3rd in the order of inflation, but were 5th, 4th and 6th respectively in the amount of gas they produced. On the other hand, Golden Syrup, Caster Sugar and Glucose Syrup were 4th, 5th and 6th in popping up, but 3rd, 2nd and 1st respectively in the amount of gas they produced. This suggests that a fast reaction is not necessarily going to produce the most gas; and in fact that the substances that took a little longer to get going produced more gas in the long term. One could postulate that this is because the substances that were quick to get going were used up before large quantities of gas could be produced?
Glucose was clearly the outstanding winner for producing sustained, regular respiration in yeast: it was slow to get going, but did not peak early and taper off the way the faster substances did.
Although my experiment was completed at this stage, I decided to leave it in place overnight, partly due to laziness and partly to see what would happen.

The Morning After
As you can see, Glucose (most gas) and White Sugar (first to inflate) remained inflated to an extent, although less than they were at their peak. The others had deflated and fallen down. I'm not sure why they did so, whether it was leakage or the gas was reabsorbed, or some other explanation.
But I'm not looking forward to opening them all up and filling my house with the smell of sugary yeast!
Sunday, April 22, 2007
Wishing I had a car already . . .
For years and years I've wanted to go to the ANZAC Day dawn service at Kings Park. But it's just never been feasible because I haven't had transport, or haven't been allowed to use transport I did have access to (Mum was not keen on me driving her car all the way into the city at 3 o'clock in the morning when I'm a night-owl who would only have had a few hours' sleep - not unreasonably!).
This week it occurred to me that this may be the last year I'm anywhere near Kings Park on ANZAC Day, for the forseeable future. Next year and the year after I'll be in the country somewhere (and unless ANZAC Day falls in the school holidays, I won't be able to get back to Perth for it); and after that I'll be in London. Most country towns do have their own small services, and there's even services for ex-pats in London, but the country ones won't be the same quality and I've got no idea whether I'd be able to make my way to the London ones or not - especially as it's not a public holiday in the UK so unless it was a weekend, I'd have to work that day.
And I have no way of getting to the dawn service this ANZAC Day (next Wednesday), unless I walk (for 3 hours, which means leaving around 2am, and therefore having an almost totally sleepless night!) or either take a taxi or find some cheap accommodation in the city that would mean I was right near the shuttle buses to Kings Park . . . both of which are extravagances I can't afford at the moment. So it's not going to happen. Humph!
/rant
I also have a bad cold courtesy of someone at work (all 5 of us were sniffling yesterday, so probably all of our customers will get it too!) so I don't feel great. Not fair since I had a stomach bug last week! But then I do always get everything that's going around, in cool weather, so I shouldn't be surprised. Damn immune system.
/second rant
I've been having fun the past week reading up on visiting and living in London, courtesy of the Lonely Planet Guide: London and a book called Living and Working in Britain by David Hampshire. The latter is a little out of date - published in 2005 - so I've found a few things that I know aren't correct. But apart from those it's an amazing resource and I'm discovering all sorts of things that I'll need to know but didn't know yet (such as, the UK still has TV licenses lol
). From the Lonely Planet guide I'm getting all excited about how much there is to see in London, let alone the rest of the UK and continental Europe. I can’t wait to go!
I've also straightened out the bits about citizenship/passports etc that I was having trouble with. Mum was born in England but is a naturalised Australian, and she had thought that her new citizenship wiped out her British citizenship. I've found out that she was wrong - British citizenship is an inalienable birthright and she still has it. Which also means that my brother, half-sister and half-brother all automatically have British citizenship by descent. I don't think they know that! I don't have it automatically because I was born before a law-change in 1983 (when automatic citizenship for descendants was granted to the children of female citizens as well as male citizens) but all I have to do is apply and I can have it. That gives me a British passport and the right to work unhindered in Britain for as long as I like. Good, good
Only 2-and-a-bit years . . . !
This week it occurred to me that this may be the last year I'm anywhere near Kings Park on ANZAC Day, for the forseeable future. Next year and the year after I'll be in the country somewhere (and unless ANZAC Day falls in the school holidays, I won't be able to get back to Perth for it); and after that I'll be in London. Most country towns do have their own small services, and there's even services for ex-pats in London, but the country ones won't be the same quality and I've got no idea whether I'd be able to make my way to the London ones or not - especially as it's not a public holiday in the UK so unless it was a weekend, I'd have to work that day.
And I have no way of getting to the dawn service this ANZAC Day (next Wednesday), unless I walk (for 3 hours, which means leaving around 2am, and therefore having an almost totally sleepless night!) or either take a taxi or find some cheap accommodation in the city that would mean I was right near the shuttle buses to Kings Park . . . both of which are extravagances I can't afford at the moment. So it's not going to happen. Humph!
/rant
I also have a bad cold courtesy of someone at work (all 5 of us were sniffling yesterday, so probably all of our customers will get it too!) so I don't feel great. Not fair since I had a stomach bug last week! But then I do always get everything that's going around, in cool weather, so I shouldn't be surprised. Damn immune system.
/second rant
I've been having fun the past week reading up on visiting and living in London, courtesy of the Lonely Planet Guide: London and a book called Living and Working in Britain by David Hampshire. The latter is a little out of date - published in 2005 - so I've found a few things that I know aren't correct. But apart from those it's an amazing resource and I'm discovering all sorts of things that I'll need to know but didn't know yet (such as, the UK still has TV licenses lol
I've also straightened out the bits about citizenship/passports etc that I was having trouble with. Mum was born in England but is a naturalised Australian, and she had thought that her new citizenship wiped out her British citizenship. I've found out that she was wrong - British citizenship is an inalienable birthright and she still has it. Which also means that my brother, half-sister and half-brother all automatically have British citizenship by descent. I don't think they know that! I don't have it automatically because I was born before a law-change in 1983 (when automatic citizenship for descendants was granted to the children of female citizens as well as male citizens) but all I have to do is apply and I can have it. That gives me a British passport and the right to work unhindered in Britain for as long as I like. Good, good
Only 2-and-a-bit years . . . !
Wednesday, April 18, 2007
Ticky-tacky Talk
Little boxes, on the hillside
Little boxes made of ticky-tacky
Little boxes, little boxes,
Little boxes all the same
There's a green one and a pink one
And a blue one and a yellow one
And they're all made out of ticky-tacky
And they all look just the same
This song has been stuck in my head all afternoon, since my maths curriculum class. In the maths classes the workshop leader prefers to teach us how to teach maths by getting us to do the activities we'd be using to teach our students. Today, among other things, we had to use grid paper to make as many combinations of six squares as possible, then predict which ones could be folded to make a cube, then finally cut them out and see which ones actually would fold into a cube. Hence, we wound up with lots of little boxes made of ticky-tacky, and the song stuck.
The real point of this post wasn't really little boxes though lol. The actual story is that I had a great time in Maths today - I missed the last two workshops and we had two weeks' holiday before that, so I'd forgotten how much fun that class is. There's a number of other people in the class with the same slightly silly sense of humour that I have, including the workshop leader, and today a group of us engaged in a little mild heckling and red-herring-ing, and got the workshop leader giggling helplessly. It was great
All that fun got me thinking about how I feel about myself today (which is great - the watershed of the last week has resolved a lot of things and I'm moving forward at an incredible rate) compared to that feeling of barely existing during that terrible bout of depression last week. And I was thinking about the effect that isolation of the soul can have. Everyone knows that you can be surrounded by people and still be lonely - because you're not connecting with the people around you beyond a superficial level. I think, more than anything, this might be what went wrong when I went to Sydney. I had loads of people around me, but no kindred spirits and no one who even came close to being a kindred spirit. Essentially, no one who would get my jokes
That's something to bear in mind when I go to London, and even beforehand, given the people-finding powers of the internet. It's quality, not quantity, when it comes to not being lonely. When I go away to the UK, I need to seek out a few people who I really connect with, so that I don’t begin to doubt my own existence again. This time I will have an advantage as my cousin Jess will already be there, and she’s one of the people who gets me (and who I get, for that matter).
I give you all fair warning: the odd feelings of insubstantiality during that depression episode are leading my late-night musings into some very interesting territory. Be prepared for the possibility that the ramblings on this blog will touch on some very heavy subjects over the next while, such as: “What is an Identity?”, “What is a Personality?”, and “What is a Life, and How Do You Know if You’re Having One?”.
Just letting you know
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
